Stage-oe-small.jpg

Article3043: Unterschied zwischen den Versionen

Aus Aifbportal
Wechseln zu:Navigation, Suche
 
(2 dazwischenliegende Versionen desselben Benutzers werden nicht angezeigt)
Zeile 27: Zeile 27:
 
|Volume=5
 
|Volume=5
 
|Number=3
 
|Number=3
|Pages=10:1 - 10:32
+
|Pages=10:1-10:32
 
|Publisher=ACM
 
|Publisher=ACM
 +
|Address=New York, NY, USA
 
}}
 
}}
 
{{Publikation Details
 
{{Publikation Details
|Projekt=OCCS
+
|Abstract=Organic Computing (OC) and other research initiatives like Autonomic Computing or Proactive Computing have developed the vision of systems possessing life-like properties: They self-organise, adapt to their dynamically changing environments, and establish other so-called self-x-properties, like self-healing, self-configuration, self-optimisation, etc. What we are searching for in OC are methodologies and concepts for systems that allow to cope with increasingly complex networked application systems by introduction of self-x-properties and at the same time guarantee a trustworthy and adaptive response to externally provided system objectives and control actions. Therefore, in OC, we talk about controlled self-organisation.
 +
 
 +
Although the terms self-organisation and adaptivity have been discussed for years, we miss a clear definition of self-organisation in most publications, which have a technically motivated background.
 +
 
 +
In this article, we briefly summarise the state of the art and suggest a characterisation of (controlled) self-organisation and adaptivity that is motivated by the main objectives of the OC initiative. We present a system classification of robust, adaptable, and adaptive systems and define a degree of autonomy to be able to quantify how autonomously a system is working. The degree of autonomy distinguishes and measures external control that is exerted directly by the user (no autonomy) from internal control of a system which might be fully controlled by an observer/controller architecture that is part of the system (full autonomy). The quantitative degree of autonomy provides the basis for characterising the notion of controlled self-organisation. Furthermore, we discuss several alternatives for the design of organic systems.
 +
|ISSN=1556-4665
 +
|DOI Name=10.1145/1837909.1837911
 +
|Projekt=OCCS, QE
 
|Forschungsgruppe=Effiziente Algorithmen
 
|Forschungsgruppe=Effiziente Algorithmen
 
}}
 
}}

Aktuelle Version vom 26. Mai 2011, 18:50 Uhr


Adaptivity and Self-Organisation in Organic Computing Systems


Adaptivity and Self-Organisation in Organic Computing Systems



Veröffentlicht: 2010 September
Erscheinungsort: New York, NY, USA
Journal: ACM Transactions on Autonomous and Adaptive Systems (TAAS)
Nummer: 3
Seiten: 10:1-10:32
Verlag: ACM
Volume: 5


Referierte Veröffentlichung

BibTeX




Kurzfassung
Organic Computing (OC) and other research initiatives like Autonomic Computing or Proactive Computing have developed the vision of systems possessing life-like properties: They self-organise, adapt to their dynamically changing environments, and establish other so-called self-x-properties, like self-healing, self-configuration, self-optimisation, etc. What we are searching for in OC are methodologies and concepts for systems that allow to cope with increasingly complex networked application systems by introduction of self-x-properties and at the same time guarantee a trustworthy and adaptive response to externally provided system objectives and control actions. Therefore, in OC, we talk about controlled self-organisation.

Although the terms self-organisation and adaptivity have been discussed for years, we miss a clear definition of self-organisation in most publications, which have a technically motivated background.

In this article, we briefly summarise the state of the art and suggest a characterisation of (controlled) self-organisation and adaptivity that is motivated by the main objectives of the OC initiative. We present a system classification of robust, adaptable, and adaptive systems and define a degree of autonomy to be able to quantify how autonomously a system is working. The degree of autonomy distinguishes and measures external control that is exerted directly by the user (no autonomy) from internal control of a system which might be fully controlled by an observer/controller architecture that is part of the system (full autonomy). The quantitative degree of autonomy provides the basis for characterising the notion of controlled self-organisation. Furthermore, we discuss several alternatives for the design of organic systems.

ISSN: 1556-4665
DOI Link: 10.1145/1837909.1837911

Projekt

OCCSQE



Forschungsgruppe

Effiziente Algorithmen


Forschungsgebiet

Organic Computing