Article3210: Unterschied zwischen den Versionen
Ph6889 (Diskussion | Beiträge) (Die Seite wurde neu angelegt: „{{Publikation Erster Autor |ErsterAutorNachname=Niclas |ErsterAutorVorname=Kannengießer }} {{Publikation Author |Rank=4 |Author=Ali Sunyaev }} {{Publikation A…“) |
Ph6889 (Diskussion | Beiträge) |
||
| Zeile 20: | Zeile 20: | ||
|Year=2020 | |Year=2020 | ||
|Journal=ACM Computing Surveys | |Journal=ACM Computing Surveys | ||
| + | |Volume=forthcoming | ||
|Tags=Blockchain, Distributed Ledger Technology, Peer-to-Peer, Application Development, Suitability, Viability | |Tags=Blockchain, Distributed Ledger Technology, Peer-to-Peer, Application Development, Suitability, Viability | ||
}} | }} | ||
Version vom 14. Februar 2020, 16:05 Uhr
Trade-Offs Between Distributed Ledger Technology Characteristics
Trade-Offs Between Distributed Ledger Technology Characteristics
Veröffentlicht: 2020
Journal: ACM Computing Surveys
Volume: forthcoming
Nicht-referierte Veröffentlichung
Tags:Blockchain, Distributed Ledger Technology, Peer-to-Peer, Application Development, Suitability, Viability
Kurzfassung
When developing peer-to-peer applications on Distributed Ledger Technology (DLT), a crucial decision is the selection of a suitable DLT design (e.g., Ethereum) because it is hard to change the underlying DLT design post hoc. To facilitate the selection of suitable DLT designs, we review DLT characteristics and identify trade-offs between them. Furthermore, we assess how DLT designs account for these trade-offs and we develop archetypes for DLT designs that cater to specific quality requirements. The main purpose of our article is to introduce scientific and practical audiences to the intricacies of DLT designs and to support development of viable applications on DLT.
Weitere Informationen unter: Link
Critical Information Infrastructures
Software Engineering, Blockchain