Stage-oe-small.jpg

Inproceedings1410: Unterschied zwischen den Versionen

Aus Aifbportal
Wechseln zu:Navigation, Suche
K (Added from ontology)
 
K (Added from ontology)
Zeile 1: Zeile 1:
 +
{{Publikation Author
 +
|Rank=4
 +
|Author=J.  Lu
 +
}}
 +
{{Publikation Author
 +
|Rank=1
 +
|Author=David Ireland
 +
}}
 
{{Publikation Author
 
{{Publikation Author
 
|Rank=3
 
|Rank=3
 
|Author=Sanaz Mostaghim
 
|Author=Sanaz Mostaghim
}}
 
{{Publikation Author
 
|Rank=4
 
|Author=J.  Lu
 
 
}}
 
}}
 
{{Publikation Author
 
{{Publikation Author
 
|Rank=2
 
|Rank=2
 
|Author=Andrew Lewis
 
|Author=Andrew Lewis
}}
 
{{Publikation Author
 
|Rank=1
 
|Author=David Ireland
 
 
}}
 
}}
 
{{Inproceedings
 
{{Inproceedings
Zeile 29: Zeile 29:
 
|VG Wort-Seiten=
 
|VG Wort-Seiten=
 
|DOI Name=
 
|DOI Name=
|Forschungsgebiet=
 
 
|Projekt=
 
|Projekt=
 
|Forschungsgruppe=
 
|Forschungsgruppe=
 
}}
 
}}

Version vom 15. August 2009, 20:07 Uhr


Hybrid Particle Guide Selection Methods in Multi-Objective Particle Swarm Optimization


Hybrid Particle Guide Selection Methods in Multi-Objective Particle Swarm Optimization



Published: 2006 Dezember

Buchtitel: eSceience Conference
Seiten: auf CD erschienen
Verlag: IEEE Computer Society Washington, DC, USA

Referierte Veröffentlichung

BibTeX

Kurzfassung
This paper presents quantitative comparison of the performance of different methods for selecting the guide particle for multi-objective particle swarm optimization (MOPSO). Two principal methods are compared: the recently described Sigma method, and a new "Centroid" method. Drawing on the different dominant behaviors exhibited by the different selection methods, a variety of hybridizations of these is proposed to develop a more robust optimization algorithm. Statistical analysis of the hybrid methods demonstrates their contribution to improved performance of the optimization algorithm.

ISBN: 0-7695-2734-5



Forschungsgebiet