Article3043: Unterschied zwischen den Versionen
Uri (Diskussion | Beiträge) |
Uri (Diskussion | Beiträge) |
||
Zeile 27: | Zeile 27: | ||
|Volume=5 | |Volume=5 | ||
|Number=3 | |Number=3 | ||
− | |Pages=10:1 - 10:32 | + | |Pages=10:1-10:32 |
|Publisher=ACM | |Publisher=ACM | ||
|Address=New York, NY, USA | |Address=New York, NY, USA | ||
Zeile 37: | Zeile 37: | ||
In this article, we briefly summarize the state of the art and suggest a characterization of (controlled) self-organization and adaptivity that is motivated by the main objectives of the OC initiative. We present a system classification of robust, adaptable, and adaptive systems and define a degree of autonomy to be able to quantify how autonomously a system is working. The degree of autonomy distinguishes and measures external control that is exerted directly by the user (no autonomy) from internal control of a system which might be fully controlled by an observer/controller architecture that is part of the system (full autonomy). The quantitative degree of autonomy provides the basis for characterizing the notion of controlled self-organization. Furthermore, we discuss several alternatives for the design of organic systems. | In this article, we briefly summarize the state of the art and suggest a characterization of (controlled) self-organization and adaptivity that is motivated by the main objectives of the OC initiative. We present a system classification of robust, adaptable, and adaptive systems and define a degree of autonomy to be able to quantify how autonomously a system is working. The degree of autonomy distinguishes and measures external control that is exerted directly by the user (no autonomy) from internal control of a system which might be fully controlled by an observer/controller architecture that is part of the system (full autonomy). The quantitative degree of autonomy provides the basis for characterizing the notion of controlled self-organization. Furthermore, we discuss several alternatives for the design of organic systems. | ||
+ | |ISSN=1556-4665 | ||
|DOI Name=10.1145/1837909.1837911 | |DOI Name=10.1145/1837909.1837911 | ||
− | |Projekt=OCCS | + | |Projekt=OCCS, QE |
|Forschungsgruppe=Effiziente Algorithmen | |Forschungsgruppe=Effiziente Algorithmen | ||
}} | }} |
Version vom 25. Mai 2011, 13:16 Uhr
Adaptivity and Self-Organisation in Organic Computing Systems
Adaptivity and Self-Organisation in Organic Computing Systems
Veröffentlicht: 2010 September
Erscheinungsort: New York, NY, USA
Journal: ACM Transactions on Autonomous and Adaptive Systems (TAAS)
Nummer: 3
Seiten: 10:1-10:32
Verlag: ACM
Volume: 5
Referierte Veröffentlichung
Kurzfassung
Organic Computing (OC) and other research initiatives like Autonomic Computing or Proactive Computing have developed the vision of systems possessing life-like properties: they self-organize, adapt to their dynamically changing environments, and establish other so-called self-x properties, like self-healing, self-configuration, self-optimization, etc. What we are searching for in OC are methodologies and concepts for systems that allow to cope with increasingly complex networked application systems by introduction of self-x properties and at the same time guarantee a trustworthy and adaptive response to externally provided system objectives and control actions. Therefore, in OC, we talk about controlled self-organization.
Although the terms self-organization and adaptivity have been discussed for years, we miss a clear definition of self-organization in most publications, which have a technically motivated background.
In this article, we briefly summarize the state of the art and suggest a characterization of (controlled) self-organization and adaptivity that is motivated by the main objectives of the OC initiative. We present a system classification of robust, adaptable, and adaptive systems and define a degree of autonomy to be able to quantify how autonomously a system is working. The degree of autonomy distinguishes and measures external control that is exerted directly by the user (no autonomy) from internal control of a system which might be fully controlled by an observer/controller architecture that is part of the system (full autonomy). The quantitative degree of autonomy provides the basis for characterizing the notion of controlled self-organization. Furthermore, we discuss several alternatives for the design of organic systems.
ISSN: 1556-4665
DOI Link: 10.1145/1837909.1837911