Stage-oe-small.jpg

Inproceedings3357: Unterschied zwischen den Versionen

Aus Aifbportal
Wechseln zu:Navigation, Suche
Zeile 16: Zeile 16:
 
}}
 
}}
 
{{Inproceedings
 
{{Inproceedings
|Referiert=False
+
|Referiert=True
 
|Title=A Comparative Evaluation of Cross-lingual Text Annotation Techniques
 
|Title=A Comparative Evaluation of Cross-lingual Text Annotation Techniques
 
|Year=2013
 
|Year=2013

Version vom 14. Mai 2014, 11:52 Uhr


A Comparative Evaluation of Cross-lingual Text Annotation Techniques


A Comparative Evaluation of Cross-lingual Text Annotation Techniques



Published: 2013 September

Buchtitel: Conference and Labs of the Evaluation Forum (CLEF 2013)
Nummer: 8138
Reihe: LNCS
Seiten: 124--135
Verlag: Springer
Erscheinungsort: Heidelberg

Referierte Veröffentlichung

BibTeX

Kurzfassung
In this paper, we study the problem of extracting knowledge from textual documents written in different languages by annotating the text on the basis of a cross-lingual knowledge base, namely Wikipedia. Our contribution is twofold. First, we propose a novel framework for evaluating cross-lingual text annotation techniques, based on annotation of a parallel corpus to a hub-language in a cross-lingual knowledge base. Second, we investigate the performance of different cross-lingual text annotation techniques according to our proposed evaluation framework. We perform experiments for an empirical comparison of three approaches: (i) Cross-lingual Named Entity Annotation (CL-NEA), (ii) Cross-lingual Wikifier Annotation (CL-WIFI), and (iii) Cross-lingual Explicit Semantic Analysis (CL-ESA). Besides establishing an evaluation framework, our results show the differences between the three investigated approaches and demonstrate their advantages and disadvantages.


Projekt

XLike



Forschungsgruppe

Wissensmanagement


Forschungsgebiet